



Rank |
Team |
Over Rec |
Conf |
Conf Rec |
L
10 Rec |
T
50 Rec |
W/L Str |
RPI |
OOC SOS |


2012
Conference Tournament Schedule |
|||
| Conference | Date | Place | Winner |
| Atlantic 10 | 3/11/2012 | Atlantic City, NJ | St. Bonaventure |
| ACC | 3/11/2012 | Atlanta, GA | Florida St. |
| America East | 3/10/2012 | Highest Seed | Vermont |
| Atlantic Sun | 3/3/2012 | Macon, GA | Belmont |
| Big Ten | 3/11/2012 | Indianapolis, IN | Michigan St. |
| Big 12 | 3/10/2012 | Kansas City, MO | Missouri |
| Big East | 3/10/2012 | New York, NY | Louisville |
| Big Sky | 3/7/2012 | Season Champ | Montana |
| Big South | 3/3/2012 | Highest Seed | NC Asheville |
| Big West | 3/10/2012 | Anaheim, CA | Long Beach St. |
| Colonial | 3/5/2012 | Richmond, VA | Virginia Commonwealth |
| C-USA | 3/10/2012 | Memphis, TN | Memphis |
| Horizon | 3/6/2012 | Highest Seed | Detroit |
| Ivy League | Harvard | ||
| MAAC | 3/5/2012 | Springfield, MA | Loyola MD |
| Mid-American | 3/10/2012 | Cleveland, OH | Ohio |
| MEAC | 3/10/2012 | Winston-Salem, NC | Norfolk St. |
| Missouri Valley | 3/4/2012 | St. Louis, MO | Creighton |
| Mountain West | 3/10/2012 | Las Vegas, NV | New Mexico |
| Northeast | 3/7/2012 | Highest Seed | Long Island |
| Ohio Valley | 3/3/2012 | Nashville, TN | Murray St. |
| Pac 12 | 3/10/2012 | Los Angeles, CA | Colorado |
| Patriot | 3/7/2012 | Highest Seed | Lehigh |
| Sun Belt | 3/6/2012 | Hot Springs, AR | Western Kentucky |
| Southern | 3/5/2012 | Asheville, NC | Davidson |
| SEC | 3/11/2012 | New Orleans, LA | Vanderbilt |
| Southland | 3/10/2012 | Katy, TX | Lamar |
| Summit | 3/6/2012 | Sioux Falls, SD | South Dakota St. |
| SWAC | 3/10/2012 | Garland, TX | Mississippi Valley St. |
| WAC | 3/10/2012 | Las Vegas, NV | New Mexico St. |
| West Coast | 3/5/2012 | Las Vegas, NV | St. Mary's |
Hot Links
Ken Pomeroy for the
scores of all games between 2002 and 2012 as without this valuable information
this site would not be possible.
Website: http://kenpom.com/rate.php
Scores: http://kenpom.com/cbbga12.txt
Jay Coleman of the
University of North Florida, Mike DuMond of Charles River
Associates, and Allen Lynch of Mercer University for their
website DanceCard. Their findings inspired the idea to expand
on their thinking by developing a probability formula and computerized seeding
process.
Website: http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm
The NCAA for providing
the Principles and Procedures for Establishing the Bracket (pdf) which was
followed as closely as possible to establish computerized criteria to select
and seed teams.
Website: http://www.ncaa.com/sports/m-baskbl/champpage/m-baskbl-div1-index.html
(pdf): http://www.ncaa.com/sites/default/files/files/BracketPrin-Proc10-5-10.pdf
Jerry P. Palm for providing
the official RPI formula. The computer for Seed Madness calculates its own
RPI using the formula provided. This calculation comes as close as possible
to the official calculation but does not provide a perfect match to the official
RPI numbers due to rounding and decimal placement cut offs. The resulting
in house RPI does come close enough to make accurate predictions.
Website: http://collegerpi.com/
Other sites of interest
Bracket Science™
is a site dedicated to helping millions of fans fill out their bracket pools
every year. It's got almost every statistic possible covering all the NCAA
tournaments since the field expanded to 64 teams in 1985. Bracket Science™
was created by Pete Tiernan and contains a myriad of information
and contests.
Website: http://www.bracketscience.com/
ESPN Bracketology with Joe Lunardi.
Joe Lunardi is the resident bracketologist for ESPN. In fact, he
invented Bracketology and has been projecting the NCAA Tournament field for
ESPN.com since its inception.
Website: http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/bracketology
The Bracket Project - The 2012
Bracket Matrix. A Look at the Projected 2012 NCAA Basketball Tournament
Bracket. The Matrix tracks other brackets all across the web -- updated everyday.
Website: http://bracketproject.50webs.com/
warrennolan.com Real
time updates of scores and statistics including RPI and SOS. Lots of predictions
included.
Website: http://www.warrennolan.com/basketball/2012/index
Distance
to the Regionals |
We are tracking the top seeds and the distance they are from the regional sites. We will take the number 1 team in the nation and put them in the closest site to their campus and proceed to do the same for 2 - 4. Here is how it all looks as of today.
| Campus-Regional | Miles | Campus-Regional | Miles | Campus-Regional | Miles | Campus-Regional | Miles |
Tournament
Selection Criteria Highs and Lows 2003 - 2012 |
||||||||
| RPI | RPI |
Major Conference | Year |
RPI |
Mid-Major Conference | Year |
||
| Highest RPI team selected | 68* |
Southern California | 2011 |
56 |
Air Force | 2004 |
||
| Lowest RPI team not selected | 37 |
Florida St. | 2007 |
21 |
Missouri St. | 2006 |
||
| Overall Record | Pct |
Major Conference | Year |
Pct |
Mid-Major Conference | Year |
||
| Worst Pct. team selected | 0.563 |
Michigan St. (18-14) | 2011 |
0.625 |
Richmond (20-12) | 2004 |
||
| Best Pct. team not selected | 0.742 |
Virginia Tech (23-8) | 2010 |
0.889 |
Utah St. (24-3) | 2004 |
||
| Conference Record | Pct |
Major Conference | Year |
Pct |
Mid-Major Conference | Year |
||
| Worst Pct. team selected | 0.438 |
Numerous (7-9) | 0.563 |
Saint Joseph's (9-7) | 2008 |
|||
| Best Pct. team not selected | 0.778 |
Washington (14-4) | 2012 |
0.944 |
Oral Roberts (17-1) | 2012 |
||
| Quality Win Index | Idx |
Team | Year |
|||||
| Best index team not selected | 11 |
Penn St. | 2009 |
|||||
11 |
Georgia | 2004 |
||||||
| Top 50 Wins | Wins |
Team | Year |
|||||
| Most Top 50 wins team not selected | 6 |
Numerous | ||||||
| Top 50 Win Percent | Pct |
Team | Year |
|||||
| Best Pct. team not selected | 0.625 |
Mississippi | 2008 |
|||||
* The highest ever RPI team selected was New Mexico with a 74 RPI in 1999.
Bubble
Watch |
The Bubble Watch lists all teams determined "on the bubble" for the NCAA Basketball Tournament. There are 6 categories used to calculate the chances for each team. Those 6 categories are 1) Win/Loss Percent. 2) Conference Win/Loss Percent. 3) RPI Rank. 4) Out of Conference SOS. 5) Top 50 Win/Loss Percent. 6) Quality Wins. The 6 categories above were discovered to give the most consistent results to determine the 68 teams the selection committee choose for the tournament field. This calculation is based on a 10 year (2002-2011) research of data and information.
IN/OUT |
Team |
Overall Record |
Conf |
Conf Record |
Last
10 Record |
Top
50 Record |
W/L Streak |
RPI |
OOC SOS |
In
The Mix |
IN/OUT |
Team |
Overall Record |
Conf |
Conf Record |
Last
10 Record |
Top
50 Record |
W/L Streak |
RPI |
OOC SOS |
Conference
RPI Rankings
|
|||||||||||||
Rank |
Conf |
RPI |
Bids |
Rank |
Conf |
RPI |
Bids |
Rank |
Conf |
RPI |
Bids |
||
Last
4 In |
First
4 Out |
What To Look For In 2013
Quality Record Index. Most of the work for 2013 has gone into the QRI. We will add this to the RPI page with a full explanation of how it works. Early results show its much more accurate than RPI when ranking teams and, when used with other factors, improves the overall prediction of the seedings.
Page Design. Not too much has been done but improvements have been added nonetheless. These changes are strictly for readability purposes.
Look for more improvements to be
added during the course of the 2013 season. See you on December 1st!